PSD Logo
Welcome  
 

2008 Plumbing Systems Specification Guide

Manufacturers Directory for Engineers

Industry News

New Products
Catalogs

Editorial
Author Information
Staff
Suggest a Story
Letters to the Editor
Reader Feedback

PSD Article Index

Subscribe Online

Change Address Online

Contact Us

ASPE Home
Manufacturer Resource

PSD Home

2009 Media Kit PDF

 


 
 

AAV Survey Respondents’ Write-in Comments

Regardless of whether you do or do not use AAVs, what disadvantages do you see them having?
  • Cannot handle pressure release
  • Not trustworthy
  • Air flows in one direction only
  • People try to use them in context of venting
  • Have not experienced any negative aspects
  • Subject to mechanical failure
  • No major disadvantages
  • Only use as a last resort
  • Do not work in a positive pressure condition
  • They don’t equalize the system
  • Acceptance by folks in industry
  • Wonder about long-term function
  • No disadvantages
  • Fail after a period of time
  • Since device is mechanical it will eventually fail
  • Misapplication is easy
  • They all fail sooner or later
  • Don’t compensate for positive pressure surges
  • It is mechanical—it will fail someday
  • Strong craft lobby against use
  • Misunderstood by code officials
  • Typical vent system still works
  • Limited applications
  • No positive pressure relief—failures common
  • Owners uninformed and difficult to convince
Regardless of whether you do or do not use AAVs, what advantages do you see them having?
  • Good alternative for island sink vents
  • None
  • Best use in retrofit where adding vent not possible
  • Much better than island vent requirements
  • Prevents exposed vent piping in open areas
  • Install in island conditions
  • Might be the only option for venting
  • Niche product
  • Good solution for difficult venting situation
  • Only thing that works in certain areas
  • They are an option
  • Can provide means of venting where conventional venting is not feasible
  • Necessary in some locations where vent cannot be routed
  • Island venting
  • If it suits the application, use them
  • Island type venting, perfect
  • Cost
  • Gives designer an option for situations where conventional vent is not workable
  • It all has to do with application and cost evaluation of product
  • Eliminates sewer odor problems from the roof
  • Better trap seal protection
  • Allows certain fixture locations to be more flexible
  • Can be installed where conventional vent piping is not possible
  • More work to replace a conventional system especially remodeling
  • Less piping to lay out
  • Don’t know much about them
  • Possibly reduce pipe venting requirements
  • Labor saver
  • Difficult venting fix
  • Good for low-wall situations where wall doesn’t go to ceiling
  • None—creates poor system function
  • Because I don’t have a wall to place a vent!
  • Control gas odors at grease interceptors and sewage pits
  • Do not use AAV as basis of design, only use in retrofit situations
  • Use only if we can provide a vent
  • Eliminates vent piping
  • Solves some problems with minimum cost and disruption

 


American Society of Plumbing Engineers
8614 W. Catalpa Ave. - Suite 1007
Chicago, IL 60656
Phone: 773/693-2773 - Fax: 773/695-9007
Email: info@psdmagazine.com